표상을 넘어 자기-촉발로 : 데카르트의 자아에 관한 장-뤽 마리옹의 해석
Beyond representation to auto-affection : A consideration on Jean-Luc Marion’s interpretation about “Descartes’s ego”
- 주제(키워드) 데카르트 , 장-뤽 마리옹 , 하이데거 , 관대함 , 자아 , 주체 , 자기-촉발 , Descartes , Jean-Luc Marion , Heidegger , generosity , ego , subject , auto-affection
- 발행기관 이화여자대학교 이화인문과학원
- 발행년도 2012
- 원문페이지 21 p.
- URI http://www.dcollection.net/handler/ewha/000000073172
- 본문언어 한국어
- 저작권 이화여자대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
초록/요약
Traditonally, Descartes’s ego that implicit in hi primary metaphysical principle-cogito ergo sum-, has often been interpreted through Heidegger’s view. His interpretation considered Descartes’s ego as a being to dominate the world through the representing activity. Some postmodern philosophers are based on Heidegger’s this point. So such thinkers are aimed at overcoming Descartes’s theory of the subject. Is such an understanding justifiable? I disagree strongly with it. So in this paper, main idea is to criticize Heidegger’s such interpretation of Descartes. In this regard, we must rely on the French Philosopher Jean-Luc Marion to embody our theme. Marion has re-read Descartes’s Passions of the Soul. Beyond mere reading, through his reading of the Passions of the Soul, Marion has interpreted not the primary metaphysical principle but the ego of auto-affection concerning Descarte’s ego. According to Marion, ego become an existential being with an ethical-axiological aim by his auto-affection. The ego is no longer a subject who represents the world. In this interpretation, Descartes’s ego cannot be understood only as a metaphysical subject. Thus this ego must be recognized as an existential-volitional ego with axiological aims. Throughout this study, we will encounter with a new understanding of Descartes’ ego.
more목차
1. 문제제기: 데카르트와 주체성의 문제
2. 장-뤽 마리옹의 하이데거 비판: 하이데거의 데카르트 비판에 대한 재검토
3. 코기토와 촉발된 나
4. 결론을 대신하여: 코기토의 확장 또는 분열?
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
