A performance comparison between the two language versions of the Affective Go/No-Go test: A randomised crossover study
- 주제(키워드) Assessment , Cross-cultural , minority , Emotions , emotional processing , Executive functions
- 주제(기타) Psychology, Multidisciplinary
- 설명문(일반) [Lyoo, Younghyun C.; Park, Shinwon; Ju, Sejin; Yoon, Sujung; Kim, Jungyoon; Kim, Young Hoon; Kim, Jieun E.] Ewha Womans Univ, Ewha Brain Inst, Seoul, South Korea; [Park, Shinwon; Yoon, Sujung; Kim, Jungyoon; Kim, Jieun E.] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Seoul, South Korea; [Ju, Sejin] Ewha Womans Univ, Grad Sch Int Studies, Seoul, South Korea; [Shin, Kyung-Shik] Ewha Womans Univ, Sch Business, Seoul, South Korea; [Hwang, Jaeuk] Soonchunhyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Psychiat, Seoul, South Korea; [Cho, Han Byul] Univ Utah, Brain Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA; [Kim, Young Hoon] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Bio & Brain Engn, Daejeon, South Korea; [Kim, Jihyun H.] Inha Univ, Coll Med, Dept Psychiat, Incheon, South Korea; [Jeong, Hyeonseok S.] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Incheon St Marys Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
- 관리정보기술 faculty
- 등재 SSCI, SCOPUS
- 발행기관 ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
- 발행년도 2018
- URI http://www.dcollection.net/handler/ewha/000000156674
- 본문언어 영어
- Published As http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12434
초록/요약
The purpose of this randomised crossover study is to validate the Korean version of the Affective Go/No-go (AGN) test. The Korean words for the AGN test were selected after careful evaluation of emotional valences, word length and frequency. Fifteen Korean advanced learners of English were administered both Korean and English versions, yielding 30 data points. The performance of both language versions was compared for each of the AGN test parameters (response latency, commission error and omission error) using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were estimated to evaluate associations between the two versions. The ICCs were high for response latencies of all valences and commission errors of positive and neutral words, but not for that of negative words and omission errors of all valences. A similar pattern of test results, as revealed by the high ICCs and non-significant interaction effects between language and word valence, suggests that the psychometric properties of the AGN test may be comparable over different language versions.
more