Credibility, preferences, and bilateral investment treaties
- 주제(키워드) Bilateral investment treaties , Foreign direct investment , Credibility , Commitment
- 주제(기타) Economics
- 주제(기타) International Relations
- 주제(기타) Political Science
- 등재 SSCI, SCOPUS
- 발행기관 SPRINGER
- 발행년도 2016
- 총서유형 Journal
- URI http://www.dcollection.net/handler/ewha/000000162000
- 본문언어 영어
- Published As http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11558-015-9218-8
초록/요약
When is a commitment mechanism employed as a solution to a time-inconsistency problem? This article provides a nuanced answer to this question by studying bilateral investment treaties (BITs). We develop a game theoretic model of BIT signing in which the government of a capital-importing country and an investor from a capital-exporting country strategically interact. The model predicts that, on the one hand, when host states highly value foreign direct investment (FDI), the likelihood of BITs increases as their judicial institutions lack credibility. On the other hand, when their preferences for FDI are only modest, the likelihood of BITs increases as their judicial institutions become more credible. We employ Cox proportional hazard models to test our hypotheses, and the results largely support our theory. Our findings have broad implications for the large literature on credible commitment, which has paid insufficient attention to the interplay between preferences and credibility.
more