What Determines the Productivity of Innovation? Focusing on the Role of K-IFRS and Audit Quality
- 주제(키워드) R&D , Patent , IFRS , AUdit Quality , Innovation , 연구개발비 , 특허권 , 국제회계기준 , 감사품질 , 기업혁신
- 주제(기타) 회계학
- 설명문(URI) https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002491659
- 등재 KCI등재
- 발행기관 대한경영학회
- 발행년도 2019
- 총서유형 Journal
- URI http://www.dcollection.net/handler/ewha/000000162535
- 본문언어 한국어
초록/요약
This paper aims to explore how the productivity of R&D investment is affected by the introduction of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and audit quality. This study is based on a sample of 3,627 firm-year observations of firms listed on the Korea Exchange (KE) from 2007 to 2014. We estimate the relationship between exogenous R&D expenditure (innovation input) and patent acquisition (innovation output) by removing the effects of contributing factors to mitigate endogeneity problem. We find that the productivity of R&D investment is negatively affected by the adoption of Korean International Financial Reporting Standards (K-IFRS) in 2011. Also, the link between R&D and patenting is stronger for firms with Big 4 auditors than those with non-Big 4 auditors. Further tests show that the positive association between R&D and patenting is weakened after K-IFRS was adopted, but only for firms with Big 4 auditors. The link between R&D expenditure and patent acquisition was significantly positive before K-IFRS and their positive association decreases after K-IFRS, but only for firms with Big 4 auditors. This suggests that Big 4 auditors enforce higher earnings quality and therefore managerial discretion in R&D accounting is constrained by Big 4 auditors. Moreover, the innovation productivity is affected by the new accounting standard when a firm’s audit quality is reasonably assured by Big 4 audits. This study adds to accounting and business research by examining the rol
more