검색 상세

Interval Cancer Rate and Diagnostic Performance of Fecal Immunochemical Test According to Family History of Colorectal Cancer

  • 주제(키워드) family history of colorectal cancer , fecal immunochemical test , colorectal cancer
  • 주제(기타) Medicine, General & Internal
  • 설명문(일반) [Jung, Yoon Suk] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol,Sch Med, Seoul 03181, South Korea; [Lee, Jinhee] Ajou Univ, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Sch Med, Suwon 16499, South Korea; [Lee, Hye Ah] Ewha Womans Univ, Clin Trial Ctr, Mokdong Hosp, Seoul 07985, South Korea; [Moon, Chang Mo] Ewha Womans Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul 07985, South Korea; [Moon, Chang Mo] Ewha Womans Univ, Coll Med, Inflammat Canc Microenvironm Res Ctr, Seoul 07985, South Korea
  • 등재 SCIE, SCOPUS
  • OA유형 gold, Green Published
  • 발행기관 MDPI
  • 발행년도 2020
  • 총서유형 Journal
  • URI http://www.dcollection.net/handler/ewha/000000174677
  • 본문언어 영어
  • Published As http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103302
  • PubMed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33066629

초록/요약

Background: The potential role of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. We assessed interval cancer rate (ICR) after the FIT and FIT diagnostic performance according to family history of CRC. Methods: Using the Korean National Cancer Screening Program Database, we collected data on subjects who underwent the FIT between 2009 and 2011. The interval cancer rate (ICR) was defined as the number of subjects diagnosed with CRC within 1 year after the FIT per 1000 subjects with negative FIT results. Results: Of 5,643,438 subjects, 224,178 (3.97%) had a family history of CRC. FIT positivity rate (6.4% vs. 5.9%; adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.13) and ICR (1.4 vs. 1.1; aRR 1.43 (95% CI 1.27-1.60)) were higher in these subjects than in those with no such history. These results were the same regardless of whether subjects had undergone colonoscopy within the last 5 years before the FIT. However, the diagnostic performance of the FIT for CRC, as measured using the area under the operating characteristic curve, was similar between subjects without a family history and those with one (85.5% and 84.6%, respectively; p = 0.259). Conclusion: the FIT was 1.4 times more likely to miss CRC in subjects with a family history than in those without (aRR 1.43 for ICR), although its diagnostic performance was similar between the two groups. Our results suggest that for individuals with a family history of CRC, colonoscopy should be preferred over FIT for both screening and surveillance.

more