검색 상세

An improved strabismus screening method with combination of meta-learning and image processing under data scarcity

  • 주제(기타) Multidisciplinary Sciences
  • 설명문(일반) [Huang, Xilang] Pukyong Natl Univ, Dept Artificial Intelligent Convergence, Busan, South Korea; [Lee, Sang Joon; Kim, Chang Zoo] Kosin Univ, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Busan, South Korea; [Kim, Chang Zoo] Kosin Univ Gospel Hosp, Korea Innovat Smart Healthcare Res Ctr, Busan, South Korea; [Choi, Seon Han] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Seoul, South Korea
  • 등재 SCIE, SCOPUS
  • OA유형 gold, Green Published
  • 발행기관 PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
  • 발행년도 2022
  • 총서유형 Journal
  • URI http://www.dcollection.net/handler/ewha/000000194548
  • 본문언어 영어
  • Published As https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269365
  • PubMed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35930530

초록/요약

PurposeConsidering the scarcity of normal and strabismic images, this study proposed a method that combines a meta-learning approach with image processing methods to improve the classification accuracy when meta-learning alone is used for screening strabismus. MethodsThe meta-learning approach was first pre-trained on a public dataset to obtain a well-generalized embedding network to extract distinctive features of images. On the other hand, the image processing methods were used to extract the position features of eye regions (e.g., iris position, corneal light reflex) as supplementary features to the distinctive features. Afterward, principal component analysis was applied to reduce the dimensionality of distinctive features for integration with low-dimensional supplementary features. The integrated features were then used to train a support vector machine classifier for performing strabismus screening. Sixty images (30 normal and 30 strabismus) were used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, and its classification performance was assessed by computing the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity through 5,000 experiments. ResultsThe proposed method achieved a classification accuracy of 0.805 with a sensitivity (correct classification of strabismus) of 0.768 and a specificity (correct classification of normal) of 0.842, whereas the classification accuracy of using meta-learning alone was 0.709 with a sensitivity of 0.740 and a specificity of 0.678. ConclusionThe proposed strabismus screening method achieved promising classification accuracy and gained significant accuracy improvement over using meta-learning alone under data scarcity.

more