검색 상세

Is early mobilization after volar locking plate fixation in distal radius fractures really beneficial? A meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies

  • 주제(키워드) Distal radius fracture , Volar locking plate , Wrist , Range of motion , Rehabilitation , Immobilization
  • 주제(기타) Orthopedics; Rehabilitation; Surgery
  • 설명문(일반) [Lee, Jun-Ku; Kil, Minkyu; Shon, Jeong In] Ilsan Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Natl Hlth Insurance Serv, 100 Ilsan Ro, Goyang Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea; [Yoon, Byung -Ho] Ewha Womans Univ, Mokdong Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul, South Korea; [Kim, Byungsoo] Inje Univ, Inst Stat Informat, Dept Stat, Gimhae, South Korea; [Ha, Cheungsoo] CHA Univ, CHA Bundang Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, Seongnam Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea; [Lee, Hyun Il] Inje Univ, Ilsan Paik Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Coll Med, Goyang, South Korea; [Lee, Hyun Il] Inje Univ, Ilsan Paik Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 170 Juhwa Ro, Goyang Si 10380, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
  • 등재 SCIE, SCOPUS
  • 발행기관 HANLEY & BELFUS-ELSEVIER INC
  • 발행년도 2023
  • 총서유형 Journal
  • URI http://www.dcollection.net/handler/ewha/000000208841
  • 본문언어 영어
  • Published As https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2021.10.003
  • PubMed 34972603

초록/요약

Study design: This was a systematic review with a meta-analysis. Introduction: Despite rising trends toward surgical treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF) with volar locking plate (VLP) fixation, there is a lack of consensus on when to start vigorous wrist range of motionPurpose: We performed a meta-analysis to compare early and late mobilization after VLP fixation in patients with DRF. Methods: Four prospective randomized controlled trials with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up were retrieved through MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and the KoreaMed databases in March 2021. We divided patients into an early group (patients who started ROM exercises of the wrist within 2 weeks after surgery), and a late group (patients who started ROM exercises 5 or 6 weeks after surgery). The primary outcome was treatment efficacy which was measured through improvement in pain score, function score, ROM, and grip power. The secondary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications.Results: This meta-analysis included 127 patients in the early group and 131 patients in the late group. The outcomes were compared at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. There was no significant difference in pain score, though the early group had a lower average visual analog scale score. The early group had a lower arm, shoulder, and hand disability score than the late group (95 % CI, -16.25 to -8.35 points; P < .001) at 6 weeks postoperatively, suggesting significantly superior outcomes. A similar trend persisted at 3 ( n = 74 in the early group and n = 77 in the late group; 95% CI, -5.45 to -0.30; P = .029) and 6 months ( n = 102 in the early group and n = 100 in the late group; 95% CI, -4.81 to 0.21; P = .073), but the differences were smaller. The early group had a higher grip power at all follow-up periods, but the difference was only significant at 6 months postoperatively ( n = 88 in the early group and n = 83 in the late group; 95% CI, 0.50 to 6.99; P = 0.024). The early group also had more favorable ROM in all directions at 6 weeks, but only in supination at 6 months. The complication rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups. There were no differences in the rates of secondary operation and reduction loss.

more